Flip Flop Price AJIO vs Myntra November 2026: Leadcat Rs. 1 Apart

Flip-flops are the cheapest thing either of these retailers sells, which makes them a useful test. We read AJIO's and Myntra's own listing data on 10 November 2026 and matched every product we could identify from the two retailers' own titles.

On the branded slides, there is almost nothing between them. Puma's Leadcat 2.0 is Rs. 1,125 on AJIO and Rs. 1,124 on Myntra. Puma's Wave flip-flop is Rs. 860 and Rs. 859. A Metro slip-on is Rs. 1,245 on both. All three carry the identical stated MRP on both sites and badges that match to within a point.

The difference is not the price. It is that one of these shelves publishes no customer evidence whatsoever. Not one of AJIO's 115 listings carries a star average or a rating count. 78 of Myntra's 101 do - and the same Puma Leadcat slide shows 27,479 ratings there.

Everything below is read from the two retailers' own pages, logged out, from India, with nothing bought and no coupon applied. Nothing was worn or handled, and no claim about comfort, grip or durability is made or endorsed here.

Four of those six are effectively the same price. One rupee on the Leadcat, one rupee on the Wave, nothing at all on the Metro sandal, twenty rupees on the Popcat. On all four, the stated MRP is identical on both sites too - Rs. 2,499, Rs. 1,999, Rs. 2,490 and Rs. 1,999 - which is why their badges land within a point of each other.

Where they do diverge, they diverge in both directions. Myntra is Rs. 126 cheaper on the adidas Adilette Aqua; AJIO is Rs. 150 cheaper on the Shoetopia open-toe slides. Neither site is simply the cheaper one for flip-flops.

The adidas row is the one worth reading twice. Both sites state Rs. 2,499. AJIO sells at Rs. 1,250 and badges it 50%; Myntra sells at Rs. 1,124 and badges it 55%. Here, unusually, the deeper badge really does mark the cheaper pair - because for once the two sites agree on the reference price underneath it.

The rating column tells you something the price column cannot. Every AJIO cell in it is empty. That is not a gap in this read; AJIO returned no rating data for any of its 115 listings.

This is the single largest difference between the two retailers on this category, and it has nothing to do with price. AJIO published no star average and no rating count on any of the 115 listings it returned. Myntra published both on 78 of its 101.

On the products both sell, that asymmetry is stark. The Puma Leadcat 2.0 costs a rupee less on Myntra and arrives with 27,479 ratings at 4.4 stars. The identical slide on AJIO costs Rs. 1,125 and arrives with nothing. The Puma Wave flip-flop: 25,600 ratings on Myntra, none on AJIO. The Metro sandal: 3,249 against none.

A rating count measures how many of that retailer's own buyers left feedback. It is a measure of how much the shop sells, not of what the product does - and a shop publishing none is not evidence that its customers are unhappy. But it does mean that on AJIO you are choosing on price, brand name and one photograph, with no published signal about fit or sizing.

The practical consequence is narrow but real: where a product exists on both sites at the same price, the shelf that publishes reviews is the more useful place to read before you buy, whichever you then order from.

AJIO's median listing is Rs. 644 against Myntra's Rs. 834, and 67 of its 115 listings sell under Rs. 700 against 36 of Myntra's 101. Read quickly, that looks like AJIO being cheaper. Read against the matched table above, it is not: on the six products both sell, the gap runs from one rupee to Rs. 150 and favours each site three times.

What AJIO has is a longer tail at the bottom. Its cheapest listing is Rs. 187 against Myntra's Rs. 297, and houses like MAX and Bata put flip-flops on it at Rs. 319 to Rs. 473 that Myntra's pages did not return. Those are different products, not cheaper versions of the same ones.

Myntra reaches higher at the top in a different way. Its dearest listing in this read is Rs. 1,599, against AJIO's Rs. 2,219 - so AJIO actually carries the wider range at both ends. Myntra's shelf is more tightly clustered in the middle.

Myntra also has three listings badged 0%, selling at exactly their stated price. AJIO's shallowest badge is 5%. Both facts describe pricing policy rather than value.

The two rows at the bottom of that table are the whole argument against shopping by badge. A RED TAPE thong-strap flip-flop sells at Rs. 644 against a stated Rs. 4,599 - badged 86%. A Campus flip-flop sells at Rs. 759 against a stated Rs. 799 - badged 5%. They are Rs. 115 apart at checkout and 81 badge points apart.

22 of AJIO's 115 listings are RED TAPE, and not one of them is badged below 70%. MAX runs 11% to 20%, Bata 18% to 52%, Campus bottoms out at 5%. Nothing here alleges that any stated MRP is false - setting a reference price above the selling price is ordinary retail practice - but the badges on this shelf are describing sellers, not shoes.

• On the four matched Puma and Metro products, stop comparing. One rupee, one rupee, nothing and twenty rupees. Decide on delivery, returns and whatever offer you can apply at checkout - none of which this read tested.
• Buy the adidas Adilette Aqua on Myntra if those are the two listings in front of you. Rs. 1,124 against Rs. 1,250 off an identical stated Rs. 2,499, with 8,589 ratings attached.
• Buy the Shoetopia slides on AJIO. Rs. 440 against Rs. 590 off the same stated Rs. 1,999 - the largest gap in either direction here.
• Read the reviews on Myntra even if you order on AJIO. Where a product exists on both at the same money, only one of the two shelves publishes any customer feedback at all.
• Ignore the badges on both sites. A Rs. 644 AJIO flip-flop is badged 86% and a Rs. 759 one is badged 5%; three Myntra listings are badged 0%. The percentage is the distance between two numbers the seller picked.
• Check the size chart and the return window before ordering. Footwear sizing varies by house, this read checked neither, and nothing on this page assesses sole thickness, grip, comfort or how long any pair lasts.