A discount badge is a comparison between two numbers. On Flipkart's charger shelf, one of those numbers turns out to be the same on fifteen different listings — and on twelve strings of fairy lights in a completely different aisle.
We read 76 listings on 20 October 2026. Twenty-seven of them state an MRP of exactly Rs. 1,999, sixteen fairy lights describe themselves identically at prices from Rs. 214 to Rs. 375, and an "80 W SuperVOOC" charger costs either Rs. 251 or Rs. 695 depending on whose name is on the box.
Flipkart charger and LED strip light shelves, read 20 October 2026
76 distinct listings from Flipkart's own search results, logged out, from India - nothing purchased
27 of 76 state one Rs. 1,999 MRP · charger median Rs. 284.50 · 80 W from Rs. 251
📅 Update log:
20 October 2026 — First publication. Read the same day: flipkart.com's own search results for "mobile charger" and "led strip light" via a window.__INITIAL_STATE__ parse, logged out, from India, with nothing purchased and Flipkart not contacted; 76 distinct listings captured, 36 chargers and 40 strip lights. Recorded from this read: 27 of the 76 listings stating a maximum retail price of exactly Rs. 1,999, being 15 chargers and 12 strip lights; 27 distinct stated MRPs in total across the 76; charger prices from Rs. 179 to Rs. 2,299 with a median of Rs. 284.50 and a median badge of 86%; strip light prices from Rs. 143 to Rs. 583 with a median of Rs. 256.50 and a median badge of 82%; sixteen separate listings printing '1200 LEDs' and a 10 m length at prices from Rs. 214 to Rs. 375 against stated MRPs from Rs. 699 to Rs. 1,999 and badges from 63% to 89%; six third-party listings describing an 80 W SuperVOOC charger at Rs. 251 to Rs. 282 against OnePlus's own at Rs. 500 and OPPO's at Rs. 695; Samsung's 25 W charger at Rs. 589 with 190,061 ratings and a 65% badge, and CMF by Nothing at 47% and 43%; one MAK listing carrying 21,210 ratings and a near-identically named one carrying 320; and identical rating counts across different listings from Volt Vision (4,796 twice), Refulgix (2,906 twice) and Trust Ware (190 twice). Nothing was plugged in, lit or measured. Coverage checked before writing: no Flipkart charger or LED strip page existed; the Flipkart HDMI cable and Tata CLiQ vs Flipkart USB cable pages cover cables and are not revisited here.
Twenty-seven listings, two different aisles, one stated MRP
We read Flipkart's own search results for mobile charger and led strip light on 20 October 2026 — 76 distinct listings, logged out, from India, nothing purchased.
Twenty-seven of them state a maximum retail price of exactly Rs. 1,999: 15 of the 36 chargers and 12 of the 40 fairy lights. A plug and a string of lights have nothing to do with each other, and yet more than a third of both shelves combined hang their discount badge on the same number.
Across all 76 listings there are only 27 distinct stated MRPs. None of this makes any stated MRP false — a maximum retail price is a maximum a brand may set, and we allege no wrongdoing by anyone. It does mean the percentage on the tile is arithmetic on a number you will never pay.
The shape of the two shelves
| Measure | Value | Note |
|---|
| Listings read | 76 | 36 mobile chargers, 40 LED strip lights |
| Listings stating an MRP of exactly Rs. 1,999 | 27 of 76 | 15 chargers and 12 strip lights - two unrelated aisles |
| Distinct stated MRPs across both shelves | 27 | For 76 listings |
| Charger prices | Rs. 179 to Rs. 2,299 | Median Rs. 284.50 |
| Strip light prices | Rs. 143 to Rs. 583 | Median Rs. 256.50 |
| Median charger badge | 86% | Range 43% to 90% |
| Median strip light badge | 82% | Range 42% to 89% |
| Listings carrying no rating at all | 1 of 76 | Nearly everything here is rated |
Both aisles are cheap and both are heavily badged. The median charger is Rs. 284.50 with an 86% badge; the median string of lights is Rs. 256.50 with 82%. Almost everything here is rated — only one listing of the 76 publishes no rating at all, which is unusual and helpful.
The Rs. 1,999 club
| Listing | Price | Stated MRP | Badge | Ratings |
|---|
| MAK 25 W Quick Charge wall charger | Rs. 233 | Rs. 1,999 | 88% | 7,976 |
| MAK 80 W SuperVOOC wall charger | Rs. 251 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 1,243 |
| SIGNATIZE 22 W Quick Charge 4.2 A charger | Rs. 266 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 1,070 |
| CLAT 80 W SuperVOOC wall charger | Rs. 270 | Rs. 1,999 | 86% | 8,152 |
| CLAT 100 W SuperVOOC 7.3 A charger | Rs. 276 | Rs. 1,999 | 86% | 678 |
| MAK 80 W SuperVOOC with detachable cable | Rs. 282 | Rs. 1,999 | 86% | 21,210 |
| MAK 80 W Dash wall charger | Rs. 411 | Rs. 1,999 | 79% | 187 |
| The CharmingFinds Hub 1200 LEDs 10 m strip | Rs. 214 | Rs. 1,999 | 89% | 505 |
| PESCA 300 LEDs 3.66 m rice lights | Rs. 222 | Rs. 1,999 | 89% | 1,340 |
| Longitude 1200 LEDs 10 m strip | Rs. 229 | Rs. 1,999 | 89% | 54 |
| AOZZO LIGHTS 1200 LEDs 10 m strip | Rs. 262 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 9 |
| Volt Vision 1200 LEDs 10 m blue strip | Rs. 364 | Rs. 1,999 | 82% | 4,796 |
| BestBright 600 LEDs 5 m yellow strip | Rs. 385 | Rs. 1,999 | 81% | 2,539 |
Thirteen of the 27 are shown above; the price spread inside the group is the point. At one stated MRP, the listings run from Rs. 214 to Rs. 411 — nearly double — and the badge moves from 89% down to 79% purely because the selling price moved, not because the product changed.
One MAK listing carries 21,210 ratings and another, with an almost identical name, carries 320. They are separate listings of what reads like the same charger, which is ordinary marketplace behaviour and not something we are criticising — but it means a well-reviewed tile and a barely reviewed one can sit side by side describing the same thing.
Sixteen tiles that all say '1200 LEDs, 10 m'
| Label | Price | Stated MRP | Badge | Ratings |
|---|
| The CharmingFinds Hub | Rs. 214 | Rs. 1,999 | 89% | 505 |
| Longitude | Rs. 229 | Rs. 1,999 | 89% | 54 |
| circisun | Rs. 231 | Rs. 1,499 | 85% | 195 |
| Longitude | Rs. 247 | Rs. 1,999 | 88% | 1,784 |
| Trust Ware (white) | Rs. 260 | Rs. 1,499 | 83% | 190 |
| Stivon | Rs. 261 | Rs. 699 | 63% | 38 |
| Peafowl Wholesale | Rs. 262 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 13 |
| AOZZO LIGHTS | Rs. 262 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 9 |
| LUMIONEX | Rs. 274 | Rs. 1,599 | 83% | 53 |
| 33 foot (yellow) | Rs. 337 | Rs. 1,999 | 83% | 42 |
| Refulgix (yellow) | Rs. 350 | Rs. 999 | 65% | 2,906 |
| Volt Vision (blue) | Rs. 364 | Rs. 1,999 | 82% | 4,796 |
| Peafowl Wholesale (blue) | Rs. 366 | Rs. 1,398 | 74% | 9,437 |
| Trust Ware (red) | Rs. 375 | Rs. 1,499 | 75% | 190 |
Every listing above prints the same two specifications — 1200 LEDs and a 10 metre length — under a different label. We have not counted the LEDs or measured the wire on any of them; those are the listings' own printed descriptions, reproduced here and not verified.
What the table shows is that the badge is tracking the stated MRP, not the price. The cheapest light here, at Rs. 214, prints 89% off. The Stivon at Rs. 261 prints 63% — the smallest badge on the list — because its stated MRP is Rs. 699 instead of Rs. 1,999. A shopper sorting by discount would pass over the Rs. 261 light and buy the Rs. 364 one.
Sort this shelf by the rupee figure and the whole problem disappears.
The same printed specification, at Rs. 251 or at Rs. 695
| Listing | Price | Stated MRP | Badge | Ratings |
|---|
| MAK 80 W SuperVOOC 6 A | Rs. 251 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 1,243 |
| shopbucket 80 W SuperVOOC 7.3 A | Rs. 253 | Rs. 2,499 | 90% | 11,603 |
| MAK 80 W SuperVOOC 6 A (detachable) | Rs. 257 | Rs. 1,999 | 87% | 320 |
| CLAT 80 W SuperVOOC 6 A | Rs. 270 | Rs. 1,999 | 86% | 8,152 |
| SB 80 W SuperVOOC 7.3 A | Rs. 276 | Rs. 2,499 | 89% | 2,912 |
| MAK 80 W SuperVOOC 6 A (detachable) | Rs. 282 | Rs. 1,999 | 86% | 21,210 |
| OnePlus 80 W SuperVOOC 9 A | Rs. 500 | Rs. 2,499 | 80% | 359 |
| OPPO 80 W SuperVOOC 7.3 A | Rs. 695 | Rs. 3,999 | 83% | 341 |
Six third-party labels describe an 80 W SuperVOOC charger and sell it between Rs. 251 and Rs. 282. OnePlus sells its own 80 W SuperVOOC charger at Rs. 500 and OPPO at Rs. 695. SuperVOOC is OPPO and OnePlus's own fast-charging standard; third-party chargers claiming compatibility with it are entirely ordinary, and we are not suggesting any of these products fails to do what it describes.
We did not measure a single charger's output. That is exactly why we are flagging it: the page gives you a wattage, a price and a star average, and on this shelf the wattage is identical across a four-fold price range. For a device that sits in a mains socket, the Rs. 250 gap between a third-party listing and the phone-maker's own is probably the cheapest insurance on the page.
The brands you recognise print the smallest badges
| Listing | Price | Stated MRP | Badge | Ratings |
|---|
| CMF by Nothing 65 W GaN multi-pin | Rs. 2,299 | Rs. 3,999 | 43% | 60,854 |
| CMF by Nothing 33 W Quick Charge | Rs. 799 | Rs. 1,499 | 47% | 62,764 |
| OPPO 80 W SuperVOOC | Rs. 695 | Rs. 3,999 | 83% | 341 |
| Samsung 25 W Adaptive Fast Charging | Rs. 589 | Rs. 1,699 | 65% | 190,061 |
| boAt 22.5 W Quick Charge | Rs. 549 | Rs. 2,490 | 78% | 9,624 |
| OnePlus 80 W SuperVOOC | Rs. 500 | Rs. 2,499 | 80% | 359 |
| boAt 12 W 2.4 A wall charger | Rs. 179 | Rs. 599 | 70% | 6,108 |
| Anonymous labels on the same shelf | Rs. 233 to Rs. 289 | Rs. 1,999 / Rs. 2,499 | 86% to 90% | 29 to 21,210 |
Samsung's 25 W charger carries 190,061 ratings and a 65% badge; CMF by Nothing prints 47% and 43%. The anonymous labels on the same results page print 86% to 90%. The pattern is consistent and it is not evidence of anything improper: an established brand tends to set its list price near its shelf price, so there is less distance to discount across.
The reading that matters is that a 43% badge and a 90% badge are not comparable quantities. They are two different sellers' arithmetic on two different chosen numbers. Only the rupee column is measured in the same units everywhere on the page.
One more oddity: identical rating counts on different listings
Volt Vision shows 4,796 ratings on both a 5 m strip at Rs. 173 and a 10 m strip at Rs. 364. Refulgix shows 2,906 on two separate listings; Trust Ware shows 190 on two. These are in all likelihood variants sharing one review pool, which is how marketplaces normally handle colour and size options and is not a defect.
It does mean a rating count is not always a count of people who bought the exact thing in front of you — on this shelf it can be the pool for a family of lengths and colours. Worth a glance at the reviews themselves before treating a big number as proof.
What this page does not tell you
This is a price read, not a product test. We did not plug in a charger, light a strip, measure a wattage, count an LED or check a length or a safety certification. "80 W", "SuperVOOC", "1200 LEDs", "10 m" and "Quick Charge" above are the listings' own printed words, reproduced and not verified.
Nor does it tell you today's price. Every figure here was returned by Flipkart on 20 October 2026. Check the live listing before buying, rank by the rupee figure rather than the badge, and on mains-powered electricals give the brand name more weight than the percentage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a fast mobile charger cost on Flipkart?
About Rs. 285 if you buy an unbranded one, and roughly double that for a name you recognise. Across the 36 charger listings we read on 20 October 2026 the median price was Rs. 284.50 and prices ran from Rs. 179 (a boAt 12 W) to Rs. 2,299 (a CMF by Nothing 65 W GaN). The bulk of the shelf — the MAK, CLAT, SB and shopbucket listings — sits between Rs. 233 and Rs. 289. The manufacturer-branded chargers are the dearer half: OnePlus Rs. 500, Samsung Rs. 589, OPPO Rs. 695. Whether the cheap ones deliver the wattage they print is not something we can tell you — we read prices, we did not plug anything in.
Why do so many of these listings show a Rs. 1,999 MRP?
We can only report that they do. Twenty-seven of the 76 listings we read — 15 of the 36 chargers and 12 of the 40 fairy-light listings — state a maximum retail price of exactly Rs. 1,999. That is two completely unrelated aisles anchoring to one number, and across both shelves there were only 27 distinct stated MRPs for 76 listings. A maximum retail price is a maximum a brand is entitled to set, and we are not saying any of these figures is false or that anyone has done anything wrong. The practical consequence is simply this: when the same Rs. 1,999 sits behind a Rs. 233 charger and a Rs. 385 string of lights, the percentage printed on the tile is telling you about that shared number, not about the thing you are buying. Read the rupee figure.
Sixteen listings say '1200 LEDs, 10 m'. Are they the same light?
They describe themselves identically; we cannot confirm they are the same product. Sixteen separate listings on this shelf print '1200 LEDs' and a 10 m length, under sixteen different labels, at prices from Rs. 214 to Rs. 375. What changes most is not the price but the stated MRP, which ranges from Rs. 699 to Rs. 1,999, and the badge follows it: the cheapest listing on that list, at Rs. 214, prints the biggest discount (89%), while a Rs. 261 listing prints the smallest (63%) — because its stated MRP is Rs. 699 rather than Rs. 1,999. If you were ranking by badge you would skip the Rs. 261 light for the Rs. 364 one. The rupee column sorts this shelf correctly; the percentage column does not.
Is a Rs. 251 '80 W SuperVOOC' charger the same as the OnePlus one?
We do not know, and the listing does not tell you. What we can report is the price spread: six listings from MAK, CLAT, SB and shopbucket describe themselves as 80 W SuperVOOC chargers and sell for Rs. 251 to Rs. 282, while OnePlus charges Rs. 500 for its own 80 W SuperVOOC charger and OPPO Rs. 695. SuperVOOC is OPPO and OnePlus's own fast-charging standard, and third-party chargers describing compatibility with it are ordinary and legal. We did not measure any charger's output and we are not suggesting that any of these products fails to do what it says. We are pointing out that the shelf offers the same printed specification at a quarter of the price and gives you nothing on the page to tell the two apart. With something that takes mains voltage, that is worth knowing before you sort by price.
Why do Samsung and CMF show much smaller discounts?
Because their stated MRPs are closer to what they actually charge. Samsung's 25 W charger sells at Rs. 589 against a stated Rs. 1,699 — a 65% badge — and carries 190,061 ratings. CMF by Nothing's 33 W prints 47% and its 65 W GaN prints 43%. On the same results page the anonymous labels print 86% to 90%. This is not evidence that anyone is inflating anything; established brands simply tend to set a list price near the shelf price, so there is less to discount from. The useful reading is that the badge measures the gap between two numbers the seller chose, and a 43% badge on a Rs. 2,299 charger and a 90% badge on a Rs. 253 one are not comparable quantities.
Prices & codes last verified: October 20, 2026
Zoutons earns affiliate commission on some links on this page. It costs you nothing and it does not decide what we write. Every price, stated MRP, discount badge, star average and rating count above was returned by flipkart.com's own search results on 20 October 2026, logged out, from India, with nothing purchased. This is a price read, not a product test. Nothing was plugged into a socket, lit, measured or certified — wattages, charging-standard names such as SuperVOOC, Quick Charge, Dash and VOOC, LED counts and cable lengths are the listings' own printed descriptions, reproduced here and not independently verified. NO STATED MRP IS CALLED FALSE AND NO WRONGDOING BY ANY BRAND, SELLER OR BY FLIPKART IS ALLEGED. A maximum retail price is a maximum a brand is entitled to set, and listings sharing a stated MRP, a specification or a rating pool are in all likelihood ordinary variants or ordinary marketplace listing practice. We do not suggest that any third-party charger fails to deliver the wattage it states; we report only that the page offers the same printed specification across a four-fold price range and gives a buyer nothing to tell them apart. Mains-powered electricals are worth buying on more than a price sort. What Flipkart publishes at the time you buy prevails over anything here.