Sixty-three sliders read on 5 October. When two listings show exactly the same rating count, they are one product record - and often not one price.
Sliders are a shelf where the same shoe appears several times, which makes the rating count more useful than the discount badge. Among the 63 listings Myntra returned on 5 October, three are the Puma Leadcat 2.0 - at Rs. 999, Rs. 1,124 and Rs. 1,249, all stating the same Rs. 2,499 MRP and all displaying the identical 4.4 stars from 25,847 ratings. An exactly matching count means one product record behind all three, so the Rs. 250 between the cheapest and dearest is paid for nothing a shopper can see.
Every price below was pulled from Myntra on October 5, 2026 and checked against the MRP on the listing. Stack them with the live codes on our Myntra coupons page, which the deals desk re-verifies daily.
Three Puma Leadcat 2.0 listings at Rs. 999, Rs. 1,124 and Rs. 1,249, all showing the identical 25,847 ratings - plus two Wave Flip listings Rs. 40 apart and two Crocs listings at exactly the same price.
A Puma Leadcat 2.0 slide at Rs. 999.
Why it earned its spot The floor of three listings sharing one 25,847-rating pool.
A second Puma Leadcat 2.0 listing at Rs. 1,249.
Why it earned its spot The dearest of the three, badged 50% against the identical stated MRP.
A third Puma Leadcat 2.0 listing at Rs. 1,124.
Why it earned its spot Completes a Rs. 999 / Rs. 1,124 / Rs. 1,249 ladder on one rating pool.
A Puma Wave Flip flip-flop at Rs. 899.
Why it earned its spot One of two listings sharing a 24,329-rating pool at two prices.
A second Puma Wave Flip listing at Rs. 859.
Why it earned its spot Rs. 40 below its twin, badged 57% against the same stated Rs. 1,999.
A Crocs Baya II unisex slide at Rs. 1,497.
Why it earned its spot The most expensive listing seated, duplicated at an identical price.
Where the counts differ the listings are separate records - so the same shoe name at the same Rs. 991 can come with 44 ratings behind it or 1,738.
An adidas AQUO slider at Rs. 991.
Why it earned its spot Eight listings in this read are this shoe, at Rs. 943 to Rs. 991.
An adidas AQUO slip-on slider at Rs. 991.
Why it earned its spot Identical money to the card above, with 39 times the published evidence.
A third adidas AQUO listing at Rs. 991.
Why it earned its spot The third of five listings of this shoe at exactly Rs. 991.
An adidas Adilette Aqua slider at Rs. 1,239.
Why it earned its spot The best-evidenced adidas listing in the read, at a 38% badge.
An adidas Adilette Aqua slider with embossed branding at Rs. 1,179.
Why it earned its spot The cheapest Adilette listing, with a pool 36 times smaller than its stablemate.
adidas runs a median badge of 38% and Puma 55%, while the listings badged above 70% are labels most shoppers would not recognise - some with 760 ratings, some with nearly nine thousand.
A printed croslite clog from an unknown label at Rs. 308.
Why it earned its spot Where the deep badges on this shelf live: labels with no recognition.
A croslite clog from the same unknown label at Rs. 290.
Why it earned its spot Rs. 18 cheaper than its stablemate against the identical stated Rs. 1,799.
A women's thong flip-flop from a comfort label at Rs. 595.
Why it earned its spot A deep badge with a genuinely large rating pool behind it.
A men's striped slider from a house label at Rs. 498.
Why it earned its spot A house-label slider with nothing published behind it.
A women's clog from a celebrity-branded label at Rs. 605.
Why it earned its spot A second deep badge carrying real published evidence.
A men's slider from a budget label at Rs. 345.
Why it earned its spot A third well-rated listing in the deep-badge band, at a third of Puma's price.
A house label priced at exactly its own stated MRP with the highest star average on the page, the Rs. 199 floor of the shelf, and a four-figure slider resting on 25 ratings.
A girls' self-design thong flip-flop at Rs. 399.
Why it earned its spot Priced at exactly its stated Rs. 399, on 528 ratings.
A girls' clog from the same house label at Rs. 349.
Why it earned its spot A near-full-price listing with a larger rating pool than most of the shelf.
A girls' quick-dry flip-flop from a sports retailer at Rs. 199.
Why it earned its spot The floor of the shelf, badged 50%, on 368 ratings.
A women's printed thong flip-flop at Rs. 298.
Why it earned its spot A familiar Indian footwear name at a mid-table badge and a low price.
A women's colourblocked slider at Rs. 1,007.
Why it earned its spot A four-figure listing with one of the thinnest pools in the read.
Four rules. First, and it is the only rule on this page that saves guaranteed money: before buying, search the shoe's name and check whether another listing shows exactly the same rating count. An identical count means one product record, and on this shelf one record was selling at Rs. 999, Rs. 1,124 and Rs. 1,249 simultaneously. Second: if the counts differ, the listings are separate records and the cheaper one is genuinely a different product with different evidence behind it - three Adilette Aqua listings here carry 42, 286 and 10,299 ratings, so the cheapest is not a bargain version of the best-evidenced one. Third: treat the badge as a brand indicator rather than a saving. adidas's 12 listings run a median badge of 38% and Puma's 8 a median of 55%, while one unrecognised label's four run 83% to 84% - and one house label here discounts nothing at all and carries the highest star average on the page. Fourth: read the count, not the star. Five adidas AQUO listings sell at exactly Rs. 991 with the identical 38% badge and carry 8, 29, 31, 44 and 1,738 ratings. If the brief is a well-rated slider under Rs. 600, Rs. 345 buys 6,197 ratings and Rs. 595 buys 8,944. We bought, wore, flexed and walked in nothing.
| Product | Sale price | MRP | Discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rs. 999, Leadcat | Rs. 999 | Rs. 2,499 | 60% |
| Rs. 1,249, same pool | Rs. 1,249 | Rs. 2,499 | 50% |
| Rs. 1,124, same again | Rs. 1,124 | Rs. 2,499 | 55% |
| Rs. 899, Wave Flip | Rs. 899 | Rs. 1,999 | 55% |
| Rs. 859, same pool | Rs. 859 | Rs. 1,999 | 57% |
| Rs. 1,497, Crocs | Rs. 1,497 | Rs. 2,995 | 50% |
| Rs. 991, 44 ratings | Rs. 991 | Rs. 1,599 | 38% |
| Rs. 991, 1,738 | Rs. 991 | Rs. 1,599 | 38% |
| Rs. 991, 29 ratings | Rs. 991 | Rs. 1,599 | 38% |
| Rs. 1,239, 10,299 | Rs. 1,239 | Rs. 1,999 | 38% |
| Rs. 1,179, 286 | Rs. 1,179 | Rs. 1,999 | 41% |
| Rs. 308, 83% badge | Rs. 308 | Rs. 1,799 | 83% |
| Rs. 290, 84% badge | Rs. 290 | Rs. 1,799 | 84% |
| Rs. 595, 8,944 | Rs. 595 | Rs. 2,499 | 76% |
| Rs. 498, unrated | Rs. 498 | Rs. 1,799 | 72% |
| Rs. 605, 75% badge | Rs. 605 | Rs. 2,399 | 75% |
| Rs. 345, 6,197 | Rs. 345 | Rs. 999 | 65% |
| Rs. 399, 0% badge | Rs. 399 | Rs. 399 | 0% |
| Rs. 349, 13% badge | Rs. 349 | Rs. 399 | 13% |
| Rs. 199, cheapest | Rs. 199 | Rs. 399 | 50% |
| Rs. 298, 40% badge | Rs. 298 | Rs. 499 | 40% |
| Rs. 1,007, 25 ratings | Rs. 1,007 | Rs. 1,799 | 44% |
Each selling price, stated MRP, discount badge, star average and rating count on this page was parsed on 5 October 2026 from the window.__myx JSON that myntra.com serves with its own flip-flops, men-flip-flops and women-flip-flops listing pages, logged out, in India, with nothing purchased. 63 listings were returned and 22 are seated.
Three listings here display 4.4 stars from exactly 25,847 ratings, two display 4.4 from 24,329 and two display 4.3 from 9,860. An exactly matching count across listings indicates one underlying product record rather than independent evidence, and this page seats those listings together and says so.
The eight adidas AQUO listings carry counts of 8, 14, 29, 31, 44 and 1,738, and the three Adilette Aqua listings carry 42, 286 and 10,299. Because those counts differ this page does not describe them as duplicate listings - it reports them as separate records of a similarly named shoe, which is a materially different finding.
adidas's 12 listings run a median badge of 38% and Puma's 8 a median of 55%, against 83% to 84% on one unknown label's four. Those medians come from the full read rather than the seated cards, so they cannot be an artefact of which listings we chose to seat.
One seated listing publishes no star average and no rating count at all and that card says so. Where a rating is shown the sample size is printed beside it: this shelf carries pools from 25 to 25,847, and a 4.1 on 25 ratings is not the same evidence as a 4.4 on 25,847.
'Croslite', 'super soft', 'quick dry', 'cloud comfort', 'lightweight', every stated material and every size description are the listings' own printed words, reproduced as printed. We did not buy, open, wear, flex or walk in anything, and nothing here is a statement about grip, sole durability, arch support, sizing or fitness for any purpose.
We can only report that it did. Three listings in this read were the Puma Leadcat 2.0 at Rs. 999, Rs. 1,124 and Rs. 1,249 - all three stating an MRP of Rs. 2,499 and all three displaying 4.4 stars from exactly 25,847 ratings. An identical rating count across listings indicates one underlying product record rather than three products, which is an ordinary and lawful way for a marketplace to group variants. Nothing here alleges mispricing or wrongdoing by anyone.
In this read of 63 listings on 5 October 2026, the 22 seated ran from Rs. 199 to Rs. 1,497. adidas and Puma listings clustered between Rs. 859 and Rs. 1,259, Crocs at Rs. 1,497, and unrecognised labels between Rs. 290 and Rs. 605. Note that these listing paths mix kids' and adult sizes, so the cheapest listings are often children's. Prices change continuously, so check the live page.
Compare the rating counts. If two listings display exactly the same star average and exactly the same rating count - 25,847 on three listings here, 24,329 on two, 9,860 on two - they share one product record, and the cheaper price is simply better. If the counts differ, as they do across the eight adidas AQUO listings in this read at 8, 14, 29, 31, 44 and 1,738, they are separate records and the cheaper one has genuinely less published evidence behind it.
Every percentage is arithmetic over two numbers a seller chose. On this shelf adidas's 12 listings ran a median badge of 38% and Puma's 8 a median of 55%, while one unrecognised label's four listings ran 83% to 84% against a stated Rs. 1,799. One house label discounted nothing at all and carried the highest star average in the read, 4.5. We have not verified that any item here was ever sold at its stated MRP, so the badge describes a seller's stated figure rather than a measured saving.
In this read, the Puma Leadcat 2.0 record carried 25,847 ratings at 4.4 stars - the largest pool among all 63 listings - followed by the Puma Wave Flip at 24,329 and an adidas Adilette Aqua listing at 10,299. Below Rs. 600, a comfort-label thong flip-flop at Rs. 595 carried 8,944 and a budget slider at Rs. 345 carried 6,197. Rating counts are Myntra's own published figures on the date read and a star average is not our assessment of any shoe.





















